Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Keith Gaddis <keith@×××××××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: XFS Question (was [gentoo-dev] New sys-kernel tree layout)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:01:05
Message-Id: 1019582133.30341.1.camel@kenny.abusedcodemonkeys.org
In Reply to: XFS Question (was [gentoo-dev] New sys-kernel tree layout) by Dave Lee
1 I've had no problems using xfs; I likewise wonder however what
2 additional patches are in this kernel. I'd kind of like to see what the
3 preempt and low-latency patches do for my desktop responsiveness.
4 Anybody know if that'll be included in the XFS sources?
5
6 On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 15:48, Dave Lee wrote:
7 >
8 > Daniel Robbins wrote:
9 > > xfs-sources:
10 > >
11 > > The xfs-sources ebuild installs sources that support XFS; specifically,
12 > > this ebuild contains a CVS snapshot of SGI's own XFS source tree. In
13 > > the future, we may add other minor (and stable) performance-enhancing
14 > > patches as well. We've found that using a SGI XFS CVS shapshot is the
15 > > best way to go if you're going to use the XFS filesystem. If any of
16 > > your Gentoo Linux filesystems are XFS, then, you'll need to use this
17 > > kernel.
18 >
19 > so when you say "minor (and stable) performance-enhancing patches" does
20 > this include the patches that are in gentoo-sources ? Also, what sort of
21 > problems where occuring with with XFS, because I am having some problems
22 > with my machine (hard hangs/resets). Anybody having severe problems that
23 > are due to XFS?
24 >
25 > Thanks, Dave
26 >
27 > _______________________________________________
28 > gentoo-dev mailing list
29 > gentoo-dev@g.o
30 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
31 >