| 1 |
22.11.2005, 17:30:50, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 09:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Also, the problem is not so much needing manpower for testing as far as |
| 7 |
> Release Engineering is concerned. It is instead having some method in |
| 8 |
> place where devs actually perform QA on their own packages. A prime |
| 9 |
> example of this is bug #110383. I was always under the impression that |
| 10 |
> if you were adding a flag to a package that affected "system" that it |
| 11 |
> was your responsibility to ensure that "system" still works, rather than |
| 12 |
> passing it off onto the Release Engineering team. Now, I don't know |
| 13 |
> what package it is that is pulling in hal for this user, so it most |
| 14 |
> likely is not hal's fault, but it illustrates the point perfectly. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Blame vapier for that one ;p (Bug 99533 half-fixed for ~arch only); |
| 17 |
alternatively, you can blame usata for adding emacs support to gpm in the first |
| 18 |
place (Bug 80217). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
jakub |
Archives