Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrej Kacian <ticho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:14:17
Message-Id: 20061016231057.46f6633b@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement by "Harald van Dijk"
1 On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:10:37 +0200
2 Harald van Dijk <truedfx@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > > Can anybody explain how that one list is different from the others? Are
5 > > the headers being munged differently for gentoo-core?
6 >
7 > This list sets Reply-to to direct replies to the list. gentoo-core
8 > doesn't. People who just hit the Reply button in their mail clients end
9 > up replying to the author, rather than to the list.
10
11 Of course, a well-behaving MUA could just use the address in List-Post header,
12 as that's why the header is there.
13
14 Regards,
15 --
16 Andrej "Ticho" Kacian <ticho at gentoo dot org>
17 Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement "Harald van Dijk" <truedfx@g.o>