Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: Patrick Lauer <gentoo@×××××××××××××.de>
Cc: Chris Bainbridge <c.j.bainbridge@×××××.uk>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage.
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:27:42
Message-Id: 1080246442.12023.7.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. by Patrick Lauer
1 On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 14:44, Patrick Lauer wrote:
2 > So ... what if hypothetically there was more than one service running on an
3 > rsync server and the server was compromised due to something unrelated to rsync?
4 >
5 > Hmmm, that reminds me of a gentoo rsync server that was compromised...
6 >
7 > </sarcasm>
8
9 What is funny about this example is that in that particular instance,
10 the attack *did* come from rsync, and was previously unknown.
11
12 --
13 Chris Gianelloni
14 Developer, Gentoo Linux
15 Games Team
16
17 Is your power animal a pengiun?

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature