Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives | ||
| Date: | Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:56:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090226185602.7581156d@snowmobile | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives by Nirbheek Chauhan |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:17:36 +0530 |
| 2 | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Is the following a stricter subset of your wording? -- |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > "EAPI must be set in an ebuild as the first non-comment line, and |
| 6 | > thereafter must not be set to a different value" |
| 7 | |
| 8 | No. With your wording, the following are legal: |
| 9 | |
| 10 | EAPI=$(echo 1 ) |
| 11 | |
| 12 | EAPI=${PV} |
| 13 | |
| 14 | EAPI=$( a=() ; a+=3 ; echo ${a[0]} ) |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> |