Archives
Archives
| From: | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] SPF at g.o | ||
| Date: | Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:46:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | 45411D86.5040800@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] SPF at g.o by Alin Nastac |
||
| 1 | Alin Nastac napsal(a): |
| 2 | > The proper TXT record for our domain would be "v=spf1 +all", which |
| 3 | > translates (according to http://new.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax ) as |
| 4 | > "the domain owner thinks that SPF is useless". And it really is useless, |
| 5 | > at the very least for our widespread organization. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | +1 ... SPF is broken by design. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Best regards, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Jakub Moc |
| 14 | mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 15 | GPG signature: |
| 16 | http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 17 | Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 18 | |
| 19 | ... still no signature ;) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] SPF at g.o | Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> |