| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 17/06/16 09:50, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> However, isn't the URL field sufficient for this? |
| 6 |
This is useful in many cases for describing the bug and similar things |
| 7 |
when the bug is being reported. Is it possible to have multiple URLs |
| 8 |
sensibly in this field? If not, then I would be reluctant to overwrite |
| 9 |
it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Ideally a gitweb field would take a repository (*ideally* ideally it |
| 12 |
would even default to Portage on Portage bugs) and a commit (a hash, |
| 13 |
or a reference like HEAD), and optionally a branch. That way I would |
| 14 |
not even have to deal with gitweb. |
| 15 |
- -- |
| 16 |
Alexander |
| 17 |
bernalex@g.o |
| 18 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXY6z0AAoJENQqWdRUGk8BZeEQAKmieGHzdSLm8R1RILhKwSVR |
| 23 |
FAxe1svyB2Ed69WgOj+XYB5/aI1TZOV1WtOmrQ9GJVSjvyxHiLqDG8leYNr2wkwX |
| 24 |
Q5Z3W/BpXLB2kUPVx6gab4873bpyFF95KmUhakgTEDd4oR9i5tuyZajORev77J4Z |
| 25 |
3MX4bvMovRFva9a4sKIhGBCdO6X0fT3Y3NTH+qwwycLH58eKJS4hFbU0pbd90agO |
| 26 |
hLrptzt+7h365Lu2A71nk4xR0AG/5W4f/N9PodvMgu33vKYmE54DEBGji3/rDp/d |
| 27 |
+ftjo41t8eSQknuJnJhr7LTylfBpPhE/zyjtkzYRvsS8Y9PtQ3I1PTXBZ7+S3jBd |
| 28 |
TVThD//urxyLJi80ZoSOslrDMa5Aq/Uct4dlv9bD6QaO15piCf1ia0Fs+FIU77po |
| 29 |
y+eBeNYMiLakWq5oBrNYBXdoOsgGA69sUxz/XmEIfJ7Jxoy5ODjLsIdr/lokXRBG |
| 30 |
B0H664+ZVr+H1r0FlE0rgT7HBTUWTwBa+aPlup/HxxyJa9U0/Hnk6K8Jrj0j6QmX |
| 31 |
bm6A1Ec8m0SPo0T+x4IlCgHPex4YrYsxy9eYhUZKDmSyGMggggEYeKO9g3DhH/SN |
| 32 |
/ej/grmsNDsh4RprKiFhWR77IT7iFWz9dbBcrnlzNk4BrwVZxdB0f1DzwcN6kffz |
| 33 |
h4PE2O9tLGZ8dpBoGc1y |
| 34 |
=9XVn |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives