Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:47:47
Message-Id: 200406221847.36192.carlo@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem by Aron Griffis
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tuesday 22 June 2004 18:25, Aron Griffis wrote:
5 > I think it's okay if the maintainer's arch jumps around. To do
6 > otherwise would be an unnecessary restriction.
7
8 In what sense? I can't see any difference in rearranged keywords to a special
9 prefix or extra keyword. Neither in internal representation nor in terms of
10 implementing this in ekeyword. I dislike order dependent configurations much.
11 It's not that visible, as the other two options.
12
13 Then again I'm pretty sure foser didn't meant using keywords; He said: "arch
14 marked as such in the ebuild somehow"... um, "somehow" is nothing to rely
15 on. :)
16
17
18 Carsten
19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
21
22 iD8DBQFA2GKoVwbzmvGLSW8RAl6iAJ4wxI/lQacQeqB2KQfESK2ffdluTACcCBsL
23 A2s57Y5n13Dys/Rah9JCo44=
24 =bY9u
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
26
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>