| 1 |
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Сергей <protserovsd@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> There is a bug (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504116). |
| 3 |
> Though it had been reported long time ago, many bugs, which this bug |
| 4 |
> depends on, are not even confirmed (see my comment: |
| 5 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504116#c3). There is also no |
| 6 |
> response to my comment, seems like all the activity about this bug has |
| 7 |
> stopped. Is it so? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
It hasn't stopped, is just that the devs don't exactly know how to |
| 10 |
continue. In particular, with glibc and all of the toolchain packages, |
| 11 |
there is a lot of historical cruft in the ebuilds and associated |
| 12 |
eclasses. The devs are discussing how to move on forward with this; |
| 13 |
the issue of /etc/init.d/functions.sh is secondary or even tertiary to |
| 14 |
this. Check [1] for an example thread of the kind of discussion |
| 15 |
happening. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I've been using my own functions.sh file for years. At its core, is |
| 18 |
basically a cosmetic issue; functions.sh never provided nothing more |
| 19 |
than a few shell functions to print pretty messages on the console. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/93994/ |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 26 |
Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias |
| 27 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives