| 1 |
Ulrich Mueller kirjoitti: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> I could not find any official guidelines for keywording of virtual |
| 5 |
>>> packages. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> They are keyworded as any other packages. You can't make them stable |
| 8 |
>> if they have ~arch only dependencies. When one provider is stable, |
| 9 |
>> they are fine to go stable. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Yes, I think this part is clear. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The point of my question was more if the usual rules apply, i.e.: |
| 14 |
> keywording and stabilising only by arch teams; wait one month before |
| 15 |
> the package can go stable. Which seems not to be current practice for |
| 16 |
> virtual packages. (And makes no sense anyway, IMHO.) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Ulrich |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The month is not set in stone. About who marks them, it's probably best |
| 21 |
to get the opinion of the arch teams. I don't think they will object to |
| 22 |
normal developers marking them. Arch teams: what do you think? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
Petteri |
Archives