| 1 |
>>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> I could not find any official guidelines for keywording of virtual |
| 4 |
>> packages. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> They are keyworded as any other packages. You can't make them stable |
| 7 |
> if they have ~arch only dependencies. When one provider is stable, |
| 8 |
> they are fine to go stable. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Yes, I think this part is clear. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The point of my question was more if the usual rules apply, i.e.: |
| 13 |
keywording and stabilising only by arch teams; wait one month before |
| 14 |
the package can go stable. Which seems not to be current practice for |
| 15 |
virtual packages. (And makes no sense anyway, IMHO.) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ulrich |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives