1 |
On Thu, 2004-04-11 at 16:09 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:01:43 +0000 Chris Bainbridge |
3 |
> <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> | Isn't this the same problem as gcc, java interpreters, etc all wanting |
5 |
> | to install binaries called 'gcc' and 'java', so we have gcc-config and |
6 |
> | java-config which allows the user to insert the 'gcc' and 'java' |
7 |
> | symbols into their executable namespace? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Pretty much, yeah. On the other hand, having a vi-config would be really |
10 |
> really stupid. I really don't want to go down that road if there's any |
11 |
> way to avoid it... |
12 |
|
13 |
Can't we just have a generic system like debian's alternatives instead |
14 |
of creating a new -config tool for every package? |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Olivier Crête |
18 |
tester@g.o |
19 |
Gentoo Developer |