| 1 |
Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Unslotted xulrunner seems to be the consensus, so we aren't committing to |
| 3 |
> "forever" maintain patches ourselves -- on a package-base that may well |
| 4 |
> expand over time. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
The consensus is to have updated applications, the new xulrunner seems |
| 7 |
quite an improvement so make _quite_ sense move towards it. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Some questions. What's the possibility of getting upstream to handle the |
| 10 |
> renaming, thereby making slotting much easier while eliminating the |
| 11 |
> "eternal" patch commitment? Has the issue even been brought up with |
| 12 |
> mozilla-upstream? I know they aren't always the most receptive to |
| 13 |
> community suggestions, but it's worth asking, anyway. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Discussing with upstream this would be good as well, BUT you shouldn't |
| 16 |
rely on that. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> How many packages are we talking about? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
A list had been produced already and is relatively short and some are |
| 21 |
just nsplugins (and those shouldn't require a change) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
lu |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Luca Barbato |
| 28 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 29 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 30 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives