| 1 |
maillog: 24/04/2005-11:00:54(+0200): Jan Kundrát types |
| 2 |
> D. Wokan wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Actually, I can understand avoiding unnecessary bit flipping. I've done |
| 4 |
> > that in databases on occasion. I'll write a SQL statement that checks |
| 5 |
> > if there are matching records for an update instead of just executing a |
| 6 |
> > statement that makes changes to those matching records. Depending on |
| 7 |
> > the likelihood of changes and the number of records to be changed, it |
| 8 |
> > was sometimes faster to pre-qualify an update instead of just doing it |
| 9 |
> > when it wasn't going to find any matches. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Yep, but we're talking about C code, not about SQL queries. I'd of |
| 12 |
> course accept this explanation if it came from PHP devs at bugzilla, but |
| 13 |
> they didn't bother, which made me a bit surprised. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Don't be surprised. The exactly same explanation is at the bugreport |
| 16 |
that you linked to in your last e-mail. I don't know if it is a php dev |
| 17 |
who made it, but the address is @php.net. Here is the exact text: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
[23 Dec 2004 7:06pm CET] iliaa@×××.net |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
This is a non issue, the code avoids touching the mask if there |
| 22 |
is nothing to change in it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> And BTW, talking about speed - setting open_basedir is quite common |
| 25 |
> among webhosters, so I think the code suggested in that bugreport will |
| 26 |
> be faster in most cases. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> -jkt |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
() Georgi Georgiev () * Knghtktty is not going to ask how () |
| 35 |
() chutz@×××.net () zucchini got into the discussion ... () |
| 36 |
() +81(90)6266-1163 () () |
Archives