| 1 |
On 10/01/18 23:20, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Being somwhat old and cynical, I'm seeing signs of history |
| 4 |
>> repeating itself. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Does being 'struck off' the list in this way apply to devs, including |
| 7 |
>> Council and comrel members? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> It would seem that this question is already answered: |
| 10 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Code_of_conduct#Consequences |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Being banned from lists or removal of dev status (which would also |
| 13 |
> remove posting privs unless whitelisted) are already listed as |
| 14 |
> potential consequences for refusal to comply with the CoC. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
I have to ask a stupid question here .. how do devs apply to return to |
| 17 |
the list? Via other devs, council, Comrel, the Foundation, Infra, or |
| 18 |
what? (the "select few"/clique/club/etc?) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I think Roy's point is quite valid .. if you want to cut out users from |
| 21 |
contribution why are you even posting on -dev ML in the first place? Use |
| 22 |
-core and/or #-dev IRC .. or is this simply an attempt to replicate |
| 23 |
#-dev IRC as a ML .. and you simply move the "problem" elsewhere .. and |
| 24 |
then apply sanctions to that system also .. you create a rod for your |
| 25 |
own back ... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I'm tending towards the idea that this is a technical "solution" to a |
| 28 |
non-technical problem, and as such, nobody is capable of "fixing" that .. |
Archives