Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 00:24:56
Message-Id: 1556568.JVTqaLWHPB@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sunday, May 15, 2016 12:48:12 AM JST Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sun, 15 May 2016 08:40:39 +0900
3 >
4 > Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote:
5 > > Please enlighten me as to what was impolite here? The strong
6 > > language of "seriously" or definitively stating that the individual
7 > > did not perform the necessary QA actions before committing? Both of
8 > > which are completely called for and appropriate. No vulgarity,
9 > > insults, or demeaning words were used. How would you have responded
10 > > professionally?
11 >
12 > It's important to remember that Gentoo is run by volunteers. Expecting
13 > a professional standard when it comes to the quality of commit
14 > criticism is unfair.
15
16 Applying that same rationale, it would be unfair to say that an undescribed
17 level of professionalism in communication is required as well. Nothing here
18 violates the CoC.
19
20 --
21 Cheers,
22 Aaron Bauman
23 Gentoo Linux Developer
24 GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies