1 |
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday, May 15, 2016 12:48:12 AM JST Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sun, 15 May 2016 08:40:39 +0900 |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>> > Please enlighten me as to what was impolite here? The strong |
7 |
>> > language of "seriously" or definitively stating that the individual |
8 |
>> > did not perform the necessary QA actions before committing? Both of |
9 |
>> > which are completely called for and appropriate. No vulgarity, |
10 |
>> > insults, or demeaning words were used. How would you have responded |
11 |
>> > professionally? |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> It's important to remember that Gentoo is run by volunteers. Expecting |
14 |
>> a professional standard when it comes to the quality of commit |
15 |
>> criticism is unfair. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Applying that same rationale, it would be unfair to say that an undescribed |
18 |
> level of professionalism in communication is required as well. Nothing here |
19 |
> violates the CoC. |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
If you're only able to behave in a professional manner if the |
23 |
standards of professionalism are explicitly spelled out, I think |
24 |
you're missing the point. |
25 |
|
26 |
Ultimately it is an attitude. When you point out a mistake make it |
27 |
either about: |
28 |
1. Helping the person who made the mistake to improve because you |
29 |
want to see them make better contributions (which they aren't going to |
30 |
do if you drive them off). |
31 |
2. If you feel that somebody simply isn't going to cut it, then by |
32 |
all means report them so that their commit access can be revoked. |
33 |
|
34 |
Either of these has the potential to make Gentoo better. Simply |
35 |
posting flames isn't likely to change the behavior of people who need |
36 |
#2, and it is likely to discourage people who need #1. Either is |
37 |
against all of our interests in making the distro we benefit from |
38 |
better. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Rich |