1 |
On 15/05/16 02:04, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sunday, May 15, 2016 12:48:12 AM JST Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Sun, 15 May 2016 08:40:39 +0900 |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
>>>> Please enlighten me as to what was impolite here? The strong |
8 |
>>>> language of "seriously" or definitively stating that the individual |
9 |
>>>> did not perform the necessary QA actions before committing? Both of |
10 |
>>>> which are completely called for and appropriate. No vulgarity, |
11 |
>>>> insults, or demeaning words were used. How would you have responded |
12 |
>>>> professionally? |
13 |
>>> It's important to remember that Gentoo is run by volunteers. Expecting |
14 |
>>> a professional standard when it comes to the quality of commit |
15 |
>>> criticism is unfair. |
16 |
>> Applying that same rationale, it would be unfair to say that an undescribed |
17 |
>> level of professionalism in communication is required as well. Nothing here |
18 |
>> violates the CoC. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
> If you're only able to behave in a professional manner if the |
21 |
> standards of professionalism are explicitly spelled out, I think |
22 |
> you're missing the point. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Ultimately it is an attitude. When you point out a mistake make it |
25 |
> either about: |
26 |
> 1. Helping the person who made the mistake to improve because you |
27 |
> want to see them make better contributions (which they aren't going to |
28 |
> do if you drive them off). |
29 |
> 2. If you feel that somebody simply isn't going to cut it, then by |
30 |
> all means report them so that their commit access can be revoked. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Either of these has the potential to make Gentoo better. Simply |
33 |
> posting flames isn't likely to change the behavior of people who need |
34 |
> #2, and it is likely to discourage people who need #1. Either is |
35 |
> against all of our interests in making the distro we benefit from |
36 |
> better. |
37 |
> |
38 |
+1 |