| 1 |
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 4 |
>> +After many years of stalled development |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I'm quite allergic to statements like this. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Remember that you may not really be representing everyone when you |
| 9 |
> express your own opinion - even if it is shared by many. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> "many years of stalled development" can only be true if there was no |
| 12 |
> development whatsoever for "many" years - which I don't really think |
| 13 |
> fits catalyst at all. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I think the statements discards the efforts that have gone into |
| 16 |
> catalyst during the last "many years" - however small! |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I understand your comment and in principle agree with it. However, in this |
| 19 |
case, as I was one of those closest to the catalyst development in the |
| 20 |
mentioned period, I believe I'm "entitled" to use such words about myself |
| 21 |
;) |
| 22 |
In any case, I'll present v2 in a bit to address the comments thus far. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> //Peter |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
Archives