| 1 |
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:59:45PM +0100, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 16 of March 2009 21:47:17 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I've got a very rough draft of what EAPI 3 might end up looking like, |
| 4 |
> > based upon discussion: |
| 5 |
> [cut] |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Nice work. |
| 8 |
> To avoid further confusion I'd suggest removing all traces of kdebuild- format |
| 9 |
> and its features (like PDEPEND labels, ranged dependencies) from PMS document, |
| 10 |
> especially its references to Gentoo KDE project. |
| 11 |
> It has not been accepted thus should not exist in "Gentoo PMS" document. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
While I'm sure there will be arguments for and against this, their merit |
| 14 |
really does not matter. What matters is that this is completely offtopic |
| 15 |
for the question of what should be in EAPI 3, and those feature's |
| 16 |
specification. Please please do not associate the two as it'll just |
| 17 |
prolong the acceptance of EAPI 3, and we all know we don't want that. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Thomas |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
--------- |
| 23 |
Thomas Anderson |
| 24 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 25 |
///////// |
| 26 |
Areas of responsibility: |
| 27 |
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council |
| 28 |
--------- |
Archives