| 1 |
On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> /etc/modules.autoload.d has always allowed module parameters to appear |
| 5 |
> >> after the module name. |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> /etc/conf.d/modules has allowed a completely different syntax requiring |
| 8 |
> >> variables based on the module name to be set with the module parameters. |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> >> This is where Roy and I have been stuck as far as an automatic |
| 11 |
> >> conversion process. The stuff you included in the openrc-9999 ebuild was |
| 12 |
> >> something I had sent to Roy months ago before I realized module |
| 13 |
> >> parameters would be an issue. Looking at a swath of various |
| 14 |
> >> /etc/modules.autoload.d/ files, I haven't come up with shell code that |
| 15 |
> >> does the right thing everytime with all the files, which is why I've |
| 16 |
> >> left it up to being a manual process for the user and simply documenting |
| 17 |
> >> it. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > expecting users to read and do it themselves is certainly a path to |
| 20 |
> > destruction for many. while i could have written it in shell, i just did |
| 21 |
> > it in awk. i hope you're just overstating things when you say months, |
| 22 |
> > because FIXED:INCVS. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > we're going to need to extend the syntax anyways to allow for |
| 25 |
> > per-version-per-module arguments. unless openrc does that now ... Roy ? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Currently OpenRC does not support per-version-per-module arguments. What |
| 28 |
> is your proposed syntax? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
i'd assume logically extended based on existing behavior. Roy's done it now |
| 31 |
though. |
| 32 |
-mike |
Archives