| 1 |
But xfree-4.1.0 released before freetype-2.0.5. So I think the lib in |
| 2 |
the freetype package must be newer. Mhh, I don't know sure... but two |
| 3 |
same libs in different version makes no sense. The other way could be to |
| 4 |
make a depend-flag in the package which uses this feature like: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
'virtual/freetype' |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
which uses X if activated in make.conf or freetype if X disabled in |
| 9 |
make.conf. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Thanks in advance |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Sebastian Werner |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- |
| 16 |
Von: gentoo-dev-admin@g.o [mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@g.o] Im |
| 17 |
Auftrag von Daniel Robbins |
| 18 |
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Dezember 2001 01:37 |
| 19 |
An: gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 20 |
Betreff: Re: [gentoo-dev] FreeType in X - why? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 01:13:04AM +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote: |
| 23 |
> > this make no sense - or? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> No :) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
>From what I understand, the freetype that comes with X is a cvs version |
| 28 |
of |
| 29 |
freetype that contains certain features that are not (or were not) |
| 30 |
available in |
| 31 |
the normal library. After we found this out, we just included X's |
| 32 |
freetype and |
| 33 |
left it at that. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Best Regards, |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
| 39 |
Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org |
| 40 |
Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |
| 41 |
_______________________________________________ |
| 42 |
gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 44 |
http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives