1 |
Jeff Rollin posted |
2 |
<8a0028260605042228t625ca152p25d65cd6bb9c8e72@××××××××××.com>, excerpted |
3 |
below, on Fri, 05 May 2006 06:28:53 +0100: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Or maybe we could move to a fixed release cycle. Debian uses 18 (?) |
6 |
> months, but maybe a 3- or 6-month release cycle would suit us better |
7 |
|
8 |
Actually, Gentoo already has that, altho the period is still getting |
9 |
tweaked occasionally. That's what the 200X.Y releases are, with the |
10 |
LiveCDs and stages, and the PackagesCD with its precompiled stuff, for |
11 |
those who want to go that route. In 2004, there were four quarterly |
12 |
releases, 2004.0-2004.3. In 2005, they reduced that to two semi-yearly |
13 |
releases, 2005.0 and 2005.1 (with a 2005.1-r1 coming out soon after, with |
14 |
limited changes fixing limited bugs). In 2006, the target is again two |
15 |
releases, the first of which, 2006.0, has already occurred. Thus, it |
16 |
looks as if the 6-month cycle seems to be suitable for the time being. |
17 |
|
18 |
Of course, one of the big benefits to Gentoo is that it's not the jerky |
19 |
upgrade/wait/upgrade cycle other distributions tend toward, but more a |
20 |
continuously upgraded system, with the periodic snapshot releases simply |
21 |
being exactly that, snapshots of the tree that have been fairly well |
22 |
tested on a particular arch and found to work reasonably well as a place |
23 |
to start. Once the system is up and going, the assumption is that folks |
24 |
will update at least a time or two between snapshot releases, with many |
25 |
updating twice weekly to daily. The more frequently you update, |
26 |
generally, the smoother the updates will be, because it won't be such a |
27 |
big jump all at once. |
28 |
|
29 |
Within that system, what's stable at the particular snapshot date gets |
30 |
tested and included in the stages, and live and packages CDs. There is of |
31 |
course some push to get stuff stable by a particular release, but that |
32 |
pressure hits Gentoo sponsored and targeted projects like portage and |
33 |
baselayout the hardest, with the vast majority of packages affected more |
34 |
by the timing and releases upstream than by Gentoo's snapshot releases. |
35 |
|
36 |
That's part of what makes Gentoo Gentoo. To change it changes the Gentoo |
37 |
we know into something else -- /not/ the Gentoo we know. I doubt you'll |
38 |
find much support for significant change among Gentoo devs /or/ users, |
39 |
because after all, if they didn't like it, they'd not have chosen Gentoo |
40 |
in the first place, as that's one of the defining characteristics that |
41 |
makes Gentoo what it is. |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
45 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
46 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
47 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |