| 1 |
On Sunday 09 May 2004 03:23, John David Ratliff wrote: |
| 2 |
> Another question. What is wrong with this name for an ebuild |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> tigcc-0.95_beta8r1.ebuild |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> The version is 0.95 beta 8r1 (This is what they call it). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Remove the r1, and there are no problems. Should I just change it to |
| 9 |
> maybe tigcc-0.95_beta8.ebuild |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Errrm...RTFM before posting please. |
| 12 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/policy.xml (3. Ebuild policy) to be |
| 13 |
precise. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Peter |
| 17 |
======================================================================== |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.50-r6. kernel-2.6.5-gentoo-r1. |
| 19 |
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+. gcc(GCC): 3.3.2. |
| 20 |
KDE: 3.2.2. Qt: 3.3.2. |
| 21 |
======================================================================== |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives