| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:50:58PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 24 August 2005 08:04 pm, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Again, returning to the USE="-*" arguement, yes, they can go that |
| 4 |
> > route. It's also kind of a crappy arguement dodging out of the fact that |
| 5 |
> > progressive bloat going into what is effectively a base release |
| 6 |
> > profile, when subprofiles would be better suited. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> not sure what you mean by 'progressive bloat' ... most of those flags have |
| 9 |
> been there since before i was a dev (so like before the 1.2 release) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> the default profile has always been a 'desktop' target and really i think |
| 12 |
> that's OK by me |
| 13 |
Reasons against sticking a level of indirection in? |
| 14 |
More then willing to assume I've been a tool and missed it, but with |
| 15 |
cascaded profiles there really isn't a good arguement against tagging |
| 16 |
a level in so that anyone after it can just use minimal, or derive a |
| 17 |
server profile off of it. |
| 18 |
~harring |
Archives