Archives
Archives
| From: | Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 | ||
| Date: | Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:37:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 47BDEF08.5080508@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 by flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) | ||
| 1 | Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 | > Beside, does it really changes stuff for anybody beside Intel fanboys? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | In fairness, not just for Intel fanboys. Drop by the forums some time |
| 5 | and just try to count up all the threads asking "are the amd64 |
| 6 | stages/media appropriate for my computer? i have a core 2...." and similar. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Technically, x86-64 is still correct, but as Marius mentioned earlier, |
| 9 | there would have to be a heckuva lot of documentation changes, which |
| 10 | wouldn't make the GDP happpy. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> |