Archives
Archives
| From: | flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 | ||
| Date: | Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:41:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | m2skzmqhjo.fsf@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 by Marius Mauch |
||
| 1 | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > - x64 is IMO the worst name for the architecture (originally a MS |
| 4 | > marketing term later adopted by Sun, looks too similar to x86, name |
| 5 | > doesn't make any sense really if you compare it to x86) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Marius said all I wanted to say on that name. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Beside, does it really changes stuff for anybody beside Intel fanboys? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
| 13 | http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 | Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 | Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |