| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:36:18 -0400 Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | I'm sending this email because I have seen some packages marked stable |
| 5 |
> | on x86 without the permission of the x86 team, and would like the |
| 6 |
> | people who can mark stable for x86 to contact us. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Would the x86 team prefer it if lots of people made arrangements of |
| 9 |
> this kind, or would they rather handle the majority of keywording |
| 10 |
> themselves? I'd imagine there are quite a few of developers who have |
| 11 |
> the hardware to do x86 testing, but who would not want to step on the |
| 12 |
> x86 team's toes... |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
For the time being, I believe we would like to make arrangements with a |
| 16 |
lot of people, instead of being in the dark about who is doing what. |
| 17 |
This way we could atleast easily know what is probably being neglected |
| 18 |
by us. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I only conferred with a few other people in #gentoo-x86. If anyone else |
| 21 |
on the x86 team has opinions about this, I'd love to hear them, but as |
| 22 |
the GLEP is outlined, I believe this way is the best way to go about it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Mark |
Archives