1 |
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:17:32 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| > | > 3) We don't specify every virtual in every profile thanks to |
4 |
| > | > cascades. |
5 |
| > | |
6 |
| > | And...? I guess you are referring to "profiles must provide a |
7 |
| > | default ..." but that _is_ a correct statement. If somebody wants |
8 |
| > | to create a new profile that doesn't derive from base, they must |
9 |
| > | specify defaults for all the virtuals. |
10 |
| > |
11 |
| > Serves them right for not deriving from base :) |
12 |
| |
13 |
| In other words, irrelevant. |
14 |
|
15 |
In other words, it's a pretty tame 'justification', especially when |
16 |
there're far better ones. It's like saying that vim is better than nano |
17 |
because the name is one character less to type in. |
18 |
|
19 |
| > AFAIK, virtual can't be removed from categories either... |
20 |
| |
21 |
| Can fix this for portage-2.0.51.20. |
22 |
|
23 |
We're gonna need another one of those "all users *must* upgrade portage |
24 |
to at least 2.0.51.20" notices? As soon as this gets implemented, anyone |
25 |
who syncs with an old version of portage is screwed (hence my original |
26 |
dep comment before I realised how nasty the error actually was). |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) |
30 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
31 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |