1 |
On 5/29/14, 12:46 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
2 |
> In general it has always worked well after a compile; but, there's every |
3 |
> now and then one or another annoying regression, like recent Chromium |
4 |
> had some font issues or some random tabs crash some versions ago and ... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> If a test catches one of these, you can immediately report the problem; |
7 |
> if it is left untested, you'll have to do a debugging adventure instead. |
8 |
|
9 |
This is one of my points: I don't remember a single chromium bug filed |
10 |
in Gentoo that would be caught by a test or that a failing test actually |
11 |
detected. |
12 |
|
13 |
By the way, I don't remember seeing many reports about font issues or |
14 |
tab crashes. Please make sure to file them when they occur, or just |
15 |
point me to them in case I somehow missed them. |
16 |
|
17 |
> While I don't run tests myself; the need for them is clear, for those |
18 |
> that aim for more production ready systems (eg. university network PCs). |
19 |
|
20 |
This seems too theoretical to me. I'd be fine with someone volunteering |
21 |
to maintain chromium's src_test in Gentoo. Unless we have such a person |
22 |
though, it seems to mostly take valuable focus away from bugs that |
23 |
definitely *do* affect our users, for no provable benefit for Gentoo. |
24 |
|
25 |
Paweł |