| 1 |
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:11:18 -0700 |
| 4 |
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> GLEP 55: On hold pending a concrete requirement for it. GLEP 54 may |
| 6 |
>> be, but that's unclear until it's been revised. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Which part of the 'Problem' section in the GLEP didn't you understand? |
| 9 |
> Do you seriously consider not being able to add or change global scope |
| 10 |
> functions in future EAPIs to be a non-issue, or were you ignoring those |
| 11 |
> two bullet points? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I understood both. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
As far as could be determined by the members at the meeting there no |
| 16 |
compelling examples in Gentoo who to change or add global scope functions |
| 17 |
in future EAPIs. As such those problems as stated are not in scope for Gentoo |
| 18 |
because Gentoo is not attempting to do those things at this time. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> Ciaran McCreesh |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives