1 |
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:23 -0700 |
2 |
"Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> As far as could be determined by the members at the meeting there no |
4 |
> compelling examples in Gentoo who to change or add global scope |
5 |
> functions in future EAPIs. As such those problems as stated are not |
6 |
> in scope for Gentoo because Gentoo is not attempting to do those |
7 |
> things at this time. |
8 |
|
9 |
You mean you don't want per-category/package eclasses, or eclasses that |
10 |
can indicate that they only work with some EAPIs, or eclasses that can |
11 |
indicate that they're being used incorrectly, or the death of |
12 |
EXPORT_FUNCTIONS? All of these have been discussed as desirable future |
13 |
extensions. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |