Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:21:31
Message-Id: 20080714002117.731f1408@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 by Alec Warner
1 On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:23 -0700
2 "Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o> wrote:
3 > As far as could be determined by the members at the meeting there no
4 > compelling examples in Gentoo who to change or add global scope
5 > functions in future EAPIs. As such those problems as stated are not
6 > in scope for Gentoo because Gentoo is not attempting to do those
7 > things at this time.
8
9 You mean you don't want per-category/package eclasses, or eclasses that
10 can indicate that they only work with some EAPIs, or eclasses that can
11 indicate that they're being used incorrectly, or the death of
12 EXPORT_FUNCTIONS? All of these have been discussed as desirable future
13 extensions.
14
15 --
16 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>