| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:23 -0700 |
| 3 |
> "Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> As far as could be determined by the members at the meeting there no |
| 5 |
>> compelling examples in Gentoo who to change or add global scope |
| 6 |
>> functions in future EAPIs. As such those problems as stated are not |
| 7 |
>> in scope for Gentoo because Gentoo is not attempting to do those |
| 8 |
>> things at this time. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> You mean you don't want per-category/package eclasses, or eclasses that |
| 11 |
> can indicate that they only work with some EAPIs, or eclasses that can |
| 12 |
> indicate that they're being used incorrectly, or the death of |
| 13 |
> EXPORT_FUNCTIONS? All of these have been discussed as desirable future |
| 14 |
> extensions. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yes I can think a lot of features like this that would be of great use |
| 18 |
in the main tree but as long as Portage is the only official and stable |
| 19 |
package manager and doesn't support the things you listed, the GLEP is |
| 20 |
not of much use. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Petteri |
Archives