| 1 |
On Saturday, May 14, 2016 9:54:11 AM JST Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Friday, May 13, 2016 4:52:09 PM JST Ian Delaney wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Sat, 7 May 2016 23:25:58 +0200 |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> > Do you seriously expect this code to work? How about testing? Or |
| 8 |
> >> > reading diffs before committing? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Absolutely nothing wrong was said here. Obviously the code was not tested |
| 11 |
> > and Michal pointed that out very plainly. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> It is actually possible to communicate both plainly and politely at |
| 14 |
> the same time. This does not require sacrificing any commitment to |
| 15 |
> quality at all. Really the only downside is having more of an |
| 16 |
> appearance of professionalism. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Please enlighten me as to what was impolite here? The strong language of |
| 19 |
"seriously" or definitively stating that the individual did not perform the |
| 20 |
necessary QA actions before committing? Both of which are completely called |
| 21 |
for and appropriate. No vulgarity, insults, or demeaning words were used. |
| 22 |
How would you have responded professionally? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Cheers, |
| 26 |
Aaron Bauman |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 28 |
GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E |
Archives