1 |
Dnia 2015-01-26, o godz. 12:57:36 |
2 |
Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:19:19 -0800 |
5 |
> Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > > what Michał claims is that 'foo' will want ffmpeg, no matter what. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Maybe he's talking about some case where portage failed to trigger a |
10 |
> > rebuild when appropriate. We've had a number of bugs like this that |
11 |
> > have been fixed. The most recent recent example is bug 531656 [1]. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Yes I know about this one :) To be honest I find it much more |
14 |
> difficult and convoluted (?) than the present case, yet you fixed it. |
15 |
> Even worse: there has been tree-wide changes made because of this |
16 |
> (removal of := from all || ( ffmpeg:= libav:= )) instead of filling |
17 |
> portage bugs... which I consider just plain wrong and was in fact my |
18 |
> initial rant. |
19 |
|
20 |
This was done after contacting the PMS team, and I think Portage team |
21 |
as well but not sure anymore. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Best regards, |
25 |
Michał Górny |