| 1 |
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 14:46:01 Matti Bickel wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 05/25/2010 08:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > they are supposed to be doing basic triage, user feedback |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Can you be more specific? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
i posted some specific examples already ... a little double checking of |
| 8 |
reports and suggestion of basic debugging steps (strace/whatever) would be |
| 9 |
nice, but i can let that slide since this is a bit more package specific. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> I wrangle bugs when there's a need and I'd |
| 12 |
> like to hear what maintainers want to see on a bug assigned to them. |
| 13 |
> If info is missing I usually ask for it and assign the bug anyway. If |
| 14 |
> that's not wanted, let me know. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
i dont feel like this should go to the maintainer yet. if a report is missing |
| 17 |
something that the maintainer needs, it isnt ready for them to look at. so |
| 18 |
wranglers ask for it, leave it assigned to bug-wranglers, and close as |
| 19 |
NEEDINFO. when (if) things become available, it can then be re-opened and |
| 20 |
moved to the maintainer. |
| 21 |
-mike |
Archives