Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 01:10:54
Message-Id: 436AB3E9.1040709@ieee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting by Ciaran McCreesh
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 > On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 19:45:08 -0500 "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org>
6 > wrote:
7 > | Just keep in mind that portage is supposed to be non-interactive and
8 > | most users like it that way. (Although the countdown when cleaning out
9 > | old packages kinda breaks that idea, but I digress.)
10 >
11 > You really should give the GLEP a read. It's quite nice, you know...
12 >
13
14 Your explanations hint at interacting with portage during an emerge.
15 Specifically you floated the idea of having emerge print a red flashy
16 message before doing the emerge. *That* is what I was commenting on.
17 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
19
20 iD8DBQFDarPp2QTTR4CNEQARAkkbAKCn8yDt7D17Ls+/huZkg4TkKjmXVwCgntbs
21 BrrWIziJCF2M8RckaINyMNA=
22 =Ytle
23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>