| 1 |
On 13/06/13 07:58, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 01:22:11 |
| 3 |
> Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> what $subject says, |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> "add support for pkg-config for migration to the new upstream defined |
| 8 |
>> bash-completion directories (prereq for bug 472938)" |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/472938 |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> ie. the pkg-config file shipped *now* in portage is a hack from me to |
| 13 |
>> postpone this |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> pretty tired so more eyes is cool ;) |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> You mean http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/85258 ? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I think you've got to convince ulm in the first place. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
His concerns was actually already covered by the first post and the |
| 23 |
linked bug: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
This is required for smooth migration path from old to new directories. |
| 26 |
Back when the old thread happened, there was only one possible value for |
| 27 |
completions dir, now there is two. And nothing prevents upstream |
| 28 |
adding/changing the values in the .pc file yet again for next release, |
| 29 |
this should be dynamic -- just like $(get_udevdir), $(get_libdir) etc. |
Archives