| 1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 13/06/13 07:58, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 01:22:11 Samuli Suominen |
| 5 |
>> <ssuominen@g.o> napisa³(a): |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> what $subject says, |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> "add support for pkg-config for migration to the new upstream |
| 10 |
>>> defined bash-completion directories (prereq for bug 472938)" |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/472938 |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> ie. the pkg-config file shipped *now* in portage is a hack from me |
| 15 |
>>> to postpone this |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> pretty tired so more eyes is cool ;) |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> You mean http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/85258 ? |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> I think you've got to convince ulm in the first place. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> His concerns was actually already covered by the first post and the |
| 24 |
> linked bug: |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> This is required for smooth migration path from old to new |
| 27 |
> directories. Back when the old thread happened, there was only one |
| 28 |
> possible value for completions dir, now there is two. And nothing |
| 29 |
> prevents upstream adding/changing the values in the .pc file yet |
| 30 |
> again for next release, this should be dynamic -- just like |
| 31 |
> $(get_udevdir), $(get_libdir) etc. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Nothing is covered. If you change the installation dir for the |
| 34 |
completion modules, then eselect bashcomp won't be able to find them |
| 35 |
any more. So you need a transition plan. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Ulrich |
Archives