1 |
Am Fre, 2002-01-11 um 20.52 schrieb Daniel Robbins: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 12:17, Sebastian Werner wrote: |
3 |
> > This seems not to be the same... |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Jakub patch the kernel and the glibc (also the 2.2.4) so it is not |
6 |
> > included yet I think. The patch add the functionality to the kernel and |
7 |
> > the glibc... The complete created applications must be patch with a |
8 |
> > program named prelink. This seems to be compatible with not prelinked |
9 |
> > applications because the patches don't delete the old lines to handle |
10 |
> > elf-binaries - they extend them to different call of prelinked and not |
11 |
> > prelinked binaries... |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Now that this feature is in binutils, the way to do this is to use the |
14 |
> binutils functionality, not Jakub's. Correct me if you hear otherwise. |
15 |
|
16 |
to use the binutils for this function seems to be... mhh I don't like it |
17 |
because it's not directly supported by the kernel. Is the |
18 |
binutils-solution an extension of the load-mechanism's? This work only |
19 |
for libaries ... or? the elf-binaries are called directy with a |
20 |
kernel-routine I think. |
21 |
|
22 |
If have not listen all the times to the corresponent channels but i want |
23 |
to know in what state are the different solutions... never heard before |
24 |
about this binutils-prelinking... mhh |
25 |
|
26 |
> |
27 |
> -- |
28 |
> Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
29 |
> Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org |
30 |
> Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> _______________________________________________ |
33 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
34 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
35 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
36 |
-- |
37 |
--------------------------------- |
38 |
Sebastian Werner |
39 |
|
40 |
http://www.werner-productions.de |
41 |
sebastian@××××××××××××××××××.de |
42 |
|
43 |
Bismarckstraße 51 |
44 |
32427 Minden |
45 |
--------------------------------- |