Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Stack smash protected daemons
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 02:11:22
Message-Id: pan.2004.09.25.01.19.19.526056@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stack smash protected daemons by John Richard Moser
1 John Richard Moser posted <415441BA.2000706@×××××××.net>, excerpted below,
2 on Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:48:10 -0400:
3
4 > | Some of the more interesting parts would be fex. python performance and
5 > | performance of python apps.
6 >
7 > Again, hard to quantify generically. I'm sure certain python operations
8 > will cause SSP to go happy-gilmore on you; process a string 8 billion
9 > times in a tight loop for example. Something in the python interpreter
10 > probably has a vulnerable looking function (i.e. a function with a local
11 > character pointer) and does very little with the string.
12
13 The definitive benchmark for Python in Gentoo would certainly have to be
14 portage, in terms of what's going to affect the most people.
15
16 --
17 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
18 "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
19 temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
20 Benjamin Franklin
21
22
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Stack smash protected daemons John Richard Moser <nigelenki@×××××××.net>