| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Duncan wrote: |
| 7 |
| John Richard Moser posted <415441BA.2000706@×××××××.net>, excerpted below, |
| 8 |
| on Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:48:10 -0400: |
| 9 |
| |
| 10 |
| |
| 11 |
|>| Some of the more interesting parts would be fex. python performance and |
| 12 |
|>| performance of python apps. |
| 13 |
|> |
| 14 |
|>Again, hard to quantify generically. I'm sure certain python operations |
| 15 |
|>will cause SSP to go happy-gilmore on you; process a string 8 billion |
| 16 |
|>times in a tight loop for example. Something in the python interpreter |
| 17 |
|>probably has a vulnerable looking function (i.e. a function with a local |
| 18 |
|>character pointer) and does very little with the string. |
| 19 |
| |
| 20 |
| |
| 21 |
| The definitive benchmark for Python in Gentoo would certainly have to be |
| 22 |
| portage, in terms of what's going to affect the most people. |
| 23 |
| |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Portage spend almost 100% of its time in other programs, i.e. gcc. :) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- -- |
| 28 |
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the |
| 29 |
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
iD8DBQFBVOA3hDd4aOud5P8RAlHNAKCNVTCtZb7ocWtX4NQzORLPlCgWUgCfTaIZ |
| 36 |
PfCu0dJnFLZvZoPPjBeqwOs= |
| 37 |
=6Hz/ |
| 38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives