Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:25:05
Message-Id: 20060613201710.006a6411@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. by Grant Goodyear
1 On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:41:21 -0500 Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: [Tue Jun 13 2006, 01:30:27PM CDT]
4 | > On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 02:14:24PM -0400, Peter wrote:
5 | > > I did. Sources don't affect anything. The ck-sources are in the
6 | > > tree, and there is dire warning associated with them. Only the
7 | > > -mm sources have any sort of warning. If a user CHOOSES to use a
8 | > > hacked up kernel, then they obviously choose to. Just like, if a
9 | > > user chooses to try out reiserfs-4, they get what they pay for.
10 | > > Sources don't affect anything.
11 | >
12 | > I rest my case.
13 |
14 | Care to elaborate? The wise, all-knowing Zen argument isn't
15 | particularly helpful....
16
17 It's perfect proof that there are users that are utterly clueless about
18 what is best for their system, and utterly clueless about how using
19 third party software can cause problems for other software.
20
21 --
22 Ciaran McCreesh
23 Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk
24
25
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies