| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> I didn't say that. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> I'm saying that (a) team leads do not want to waste their time in |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> such a |
| 13 |
>> way just to give you warm fuzzies (b) devs do not particularly |
| 14 |
>> want their team lead reviewing every single action they take, it |
| 15 |
>> sends the message that devs don't know wtf they're doing and need |
| 16 |
>> their hands |
| 17 |
> held |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> (a) Its not a waste of time, and it is a FACT that peer review |
| 21 |
> improves quality. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> (b) That's just a little prima donna... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Nathan you have this misconception that just cause a bug apears on |
| 27 |
one system it is gonna apear on multiple systems. Most compilation |
| 28 |
bugs that I have seen are usually due to user not maintaining their |
| 29 |
configurations properly. You also still fail to understand that most |
| 30 |
of us maintain more packages than just one and it is impossible for us |
| 31 |
to take and drop what we are working on to help test and confirm that |
| 32 |
a bug does exist and is not user error. As far as team leads go they |
| 33 |
make sure the project stay on task and packages and bugs are handled |
| 34 |
in a timely manner. I would like to know do you want us to have 15 |
| 35 |
devs test for a particular bug if a team lead is not avaliable or |
| 36 |
would you like us to have just 2 people test? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
This has gotten way out of control with time and how issues are |
| 39 |
delt with, personally I think that you have a vendictive against a few |
| 40 |
devs that have closed bugs on you that they have not been able to |
| 41 |
replicate and/or find invalid. I can not say either way all I know is |
| 42 |
you in FACT have a misconception of how much time goes into testing |
| 43 |
before a package is moved to stable. |
| 44 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 45 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 46 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
iD8DBQFC0IW9GDfjNg8unQIRAvhNAJ9gXX7KNauZuYTvR4exeHUR7t6zdgCgk8yH |
| 49 |
LKl2nGSz2dLjmGrPb5gJAa4= |
| 50 |
=BzWw |
| 51 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
-- |
| 54 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives