Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:28:47
Message-Id: 5388B13E.5090700@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? by Samuli Suominen
1 On 30/05/14 19:16, Samuli Suominen wrote:
2 > On 30/05/14 19:10, Tom Wijsman wrote:
3 >> On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:10:40 +0300
4 >> Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
5 >>
6 >>> I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
7 >>> ... to genkernel repository for:
8 >>>
9 >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
10 >>>
11 >>> I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :(
12 >>>
13 >>> - Samuli
14 >>>
15 >> Here is a reply!
16 >>
17 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c8
18 >>
19 >> Please no p.mask for a single line being wrong...
20 >>
21 >> Maybe it is time undertakers free this package to be up for grabs?
22 >>
23 > Here is another,
24 >
25 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c13
26 >
27 > Also alpha and x86 are broken, and the generic config is broken too
28 >
29 > :(
30 >
31
32 I'll give it 48 hours and then p.mask it. I won't be fixing it. Status
33 quo can't stand, it's like shooting
34 users to head by default. I have no plans in inserting my name to
35 genkernel's ChangeLog,
36 and I've done my best to contact people (nobody cares)
37
38 Only initramfs tool I care and can warmly recommend to anyone is dracut.
39
40 - Samuli

Replies