| 1 |
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:42:19AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: |
| 2 |
> Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > What about giving QA temporary revoke powers just like infra (Curtis |
| 5 |
> > Napier's idea), traditionalist? Fixing devrel's resolutions policies and |
| 6 |
> > Curtis' idea don't have to be mutually-exclusive. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The idea behind -infra temporary revoke power is to react to emergency |
| 9 |
> situations (as in "we must do something *now*"). Not sure a repeated QA |
| 10 |
> violation would fall into that "emergency" category. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The solution is rather to have a devrel liaison inside the QA team (or |
| 13 |
> the other way around). These are not closed groups. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Agreed. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
We don't need a second devrel, rather we need to make sure QA isn't |
| 18 |
ignored by devrel |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 22 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives