| 1 |
Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> What about giving QA temporary revoke powers just like infra (Curtis |
| 4 |
> Napier's idea), traditionalist? Fixing devrel's resolutions policies and |
| 5 |
> Curtis' idea don't have to be mutually-exclusive. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The idea behind -infra temporary revoke power is to react to emergency |
| 8 |
situations (as in "we must do something *now*"). Not sure a repeated QA |
| 9 |
violation would fall into that "emergency" category. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The solution is rather to have a devrel liaison inside the QA team (or |
| 12 |
the other way around). These are not closed groups. We do essentially |
| 13 |
the same with infrastructure and security, we have liaisons and people |
| 14 |
that are members of both groups, rather than saying security should have |
| 15 |
wheel to do security audits and "emergency security fixes". Works a lot |
| 16 |
better that way. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Koon |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives