| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 06/15/2013 06:43 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:41:18 +0200 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> On 06/15/2013 06:24 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> Why not fix the specs? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> from council log |
| 11 |
>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20120911.txt |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>> <Chainsaw> Okay for EAPI 5. *Nothing* gets applied |
| 14 |
>> retroactively. *EVER* |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> So that means some people think it doesn't even matter what the |
| 17 |
>> issue is. We never fix the spec, we just enhance it. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
>> Oh, you asked for reasoning... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> If you want the reasoning for that decision, you should look at |
| 22 |
> the entire log, and not just one line of it. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I was not talking about that decision. Stop derailing threads on -dev. |
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRvJoRAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzSE4H/iFVg/nfbMczic8xj7h/46A5 |
| 32 |
noMJ29KdJYaT9CKan9gD3vEpH8GuPwaZYSXIrfagPI3FV7ovJS6+hluGuTuzoaiQ |
| 33 |
FL9Zh3aam4mO6P5ds7yKz53Her5uM6N/wf58/81EFy4bVtNebWDbYmD8xvC/oe7i |
| 34 |
U6k4gH/PWxSd8HJCngA5lRk4/xLPeR5YKfWsvOOiQEJ+908s8Vw7nEtGIvlXKRjN |
| 35 |
+ujTlxW182jauWlV0S92KgNdsMqWk8OctJnWT2G02PqqQ6DzXkxUeKbakN9STbVM |
| 36 |
SVVbWJLTTKvQ+lfYGcIJroaA7RhR0GQqQ6HvebfIrgQiTY6kfzHpQqElA9iH6qs= |
| 37 |
=2cmH |
| 38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives