| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:41:18 +0200
|
| 5 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
> On 06/15/2013 06:24 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 7 |
> > Why not fix the specs? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> from council log |
| 10 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20120911.txt |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> <Chainsaw> Okay for EAPI 5. *Nothing* gets applied retroactively. |
| 13 |
> *EVER* |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> So that means some people think it doesn't even matter what the issue |
| 16 |
> is. We never fix the spec, we just enhance it. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Oh, you asked for reasoning... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
If you want the reasoning for that decision, you should look at the
|
| 21 |
entire log, and not just one line of it.
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
- --
|
| 24 |
Ciaran McCreesh
|
| 25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 26 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlG8mb0ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFoiQCaA5Y+T4UY2lvzGFg8VZXcl4df
|
| 29 |
0VMAoJf2dqE3T6ztIKCaMc/jXzTUxJOw
|
| 30 |
=bD6A
|
| 31 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives