| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 06/15/2013 06:24 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Why not fix the specs? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
from council log |
| 11 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20120911.txt |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
<Chainsaw> Okay for EAPI 5. *Nothing* gets applied retroactively. *EVER* |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
So that means some people think it doesn't even matter what the issue |
| 17 |
is. We never fix the spec, we just enhance it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Oh, you asked for reasoning... |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRvJkuAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz3tQH/2obXhpX8yDpmJJdzu5xdEOK |
| 25 |
I5K+RM8FJoqdNwTe/V1DPvr/aNfr8dUBCisge6mjJ999pb1jVG3FhTNIwFBOI2UE |
| 26 |
HZeMdnUtvSv3ind6FyL4bpRYGLbk9iTHEvOrZd0P92cEhtawyLwjDx4r2Ux+0ucM |
| 27 |
y5UaLXQlFw9tu8bW/eyouY7an0hg6CzMbGzImjAWGgb6O/PtTzcm0UWPZrNiQWZ7 |
| 28 |
jORvS1m/MHrJLM3EGabUsgp+ak6QOEeVKILC2YNe3XjWWhMlLNKt14BWLiWngkog |
| 29 |
LUnVDJ7eDyJjbMAcAqAW48rHE0dxUVgexQC7bMd5pLSRTuucOQGQmf9mrFoiVeo= |
| 30 |
=gerD |
| 31 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives